NASCAR Whelen Modified Tour Broadcasts Moving To FloSports For 2022

The 2022 schedule has been released for the NASCAR Whelen Modified Tour, but the pressing question for many fans recently was how they would be able to watch events remotely in 2022.

It was announced earlier this year that NBC TrackPass, which had been broadcasting the NASCAR Roots programing would be going out of business before the end of 2022. 

The answer to the question of where broadcasts would end up came Thursday with the announcement that NASCAR will team with FloSports for broadcasting of it’s NASCAR Roots elements, including the Whelen Modified Tour.

The deal also includes broadcasting of the ARCA Menards Series, NASCAR Pinty’s Series, and NASCAR Advance Auto Parts Weekly Series.

FloRacing will also broadcast events from the World Series of Asphalt Stock Car Racing at New Smyrna (Fla.) Speedway.

The NASCAR Roots broadcasts will be available through the FloRacing subscription package, which includes asphalt and dirt racing from a host of series’ and tracks across the country.

“Our partnership with FloSports is a win for motorsports fans at all levels and doubles down on NASCAR’s commitment to grassroots racing — the foundation of our sport,” said Brian Herbst, NASCAR senior vice president, media and productions. “We look forward to bringing fans all the racing they crave and investing in the tracks that provide lifelong memories to motorsports fans each weekend.”

Said Mark Floreani, founder and CEO of FloSports: “NASCAR shares our mission to grow grassroots motorsports and bring these races and athletes to an even wider audience across America and the world. We are honored to align with NASCAR as we continue to invest in the future of this sport so that we build a home for fans to both watch and experience racing in completely new ways. We’re excited for what’s to come.”

Stafford Motor Speedway became part of the FloRacing subscription package in 2021 and will continue with the streaming service in 2022.

A release from NASCAR read: “The partnership will also deliver an unparalleled investment in grassroots racing, including funding for local tracks and increased purses for drivers that compete in NASCAR’s touring and weekly series events. The transformational agreement further cements NASCAR and FloSports as advocates of grassroots/developmental racing and ensures a healthy economic model that will bolster tracks and drivers for years to come.”

Fans can subscribe to FloSports for $150 per year.

Comments

  1. Rich Gourley says

    I’ve purchased FloSports for wrestling and college basketball, it’s been hit and miss with their product. A fair amount of time there have been “technical glitches” which has resulted in lost content. Also, buyer beware if you try to cancel your subscription, very deceptive pricing practices

  2. Great news. They referenced this on the Dirt LM race (Demo Derby) from the Dome tonight then came here to read up on it. I am guessing the few holdouts will have to sign up now. It is well worth the money. I know it’s a lot more than the grassroots service, but you get a lot more. During the summer months they have 5 to 7 races on a Saturday night. They broadcast a bunch of DLM and sprint car shows and have a few NE BB Modified tracks and series.

  3. I’m not sure this is a good idea for FLO. Nascar can easily swallow up FLO and get rid of all the non-Nascar events that are streamed. I hope I’m wrong, but as a partner, they can control FLO content and even rid the channel of what they don’t approve of. I actually feared this may happen last year when FLO became so successful.

  4. Richard Belmonte,
    They are just shifting the regional tours over to Floracing since NBC Trackpass is totally going away. It’s essentially just a place to put the content. All the other higher level NASCAR series content and IMSA Sportscar racing Trackpass streamed will probably be moving over to Peacock. Should not really interfere with Floracing.

  5. Like any big move there are winners and losers here.

    Winners-all the Stafford and Thunder Road current subscribers that now get something they were paying for separately included in their FloRacing package.

    Losers-the folks that only cared about Roots Racing or Track Pass that only subscribed for part of the year with the extra content having no value to them.

    Winners-Fans and competitors at tracks like Riverhead that had the more expensive SpeedSport/Advance Auto Parts Nascar affiliated streaming package. FloRacing will be cheaper.

    Winners-fans at Oswego and the SMART tour that were planning on signing up just to get access to what they were interested in now get the NWMT at no added cost.

    Losers- all the tracks including NASCAR sanctioned tracks that are not streaming races presently mainly because of production expenses. They are falling behind. Streaming is the future.

    Winners-NASCAR-the hand writing was on the wall. FloRacing is the streaming service that is growing the fastest and they’ve tired themselves to a winner for the long term.

    Winners-the competitors of any track or sanctioning body that ties their horse to the FloRacing wagon. FloRacing’s business model includes front end commitments to competitor bonus money something other services streaming asphalt racing do not to my knowledge.

    Winner-FloRacing- They were weak in asphalt racing and now they have the biggest name and jump to the head of the class on pavement. NASCAR comes with a basket of their own sanctioned tracks so adding asphalt ovals is inevitable.

    Losers-SpeedSport and Racing America who will not be able to keep up as FloRacing gobbles up dirt and asphalt content at a lightning pace. Their piecemeal subscription and PPV model outmoded by FloRacings more comprehensive approach.

    Winners-race fans with the broadest interests that now get access to more racing coverage then they can possibly consume at a ridiculously low price.

    Loser-Advance Auto Parts???? We’ll see who gets title sponsorship but last year RockAuto was the auto supplier of choice for FloRacing.

    Winners-short track auto racing America including fans, competitors, sponsors and anyone connected with weekend short track racing. Previously isolated pockets with low ceilings of exposure now all linked with unlimited exposure nationally.

    Isn’t this a bit like Netflix, HBO Max or any of the other streaming package services. Put a ton of content under one umbrella, make the content diverse so something will appeal to the biggest audience and provide it at an affordable price?

  6. With the move of the Langley date and now the NWMT/Flo deal, it appears that NASCAR and Stafford could rekindle their relationship in 2023.

  7. Or…Stafford could be the big loser if Nascar has an axe to grind. They have more money than anyone and they toss it around to gain control. I don’t like this marriage at all.

  8. 175.00 comes next due to gas prices to cover events

  9. Does Stafford lose anything by this decision by Nascar to go to FloRacing? I don’t see what. Last year many of us signed on to FloRacing for Stafford only and thought it was a terrific deal. We got Thunder Road as well or maybe had some interest in dirt but we signed up for Stafford. Now all kinds of folks will be signing up for the NWMT and a portion no doubt will tune into Stafford whereas before Stafford alone was not worth the investment.. That’s a win as far as I can see. On the other side of the ledger this move provides none of the Stafford base any reason to leave FloRacing. Quite the opposite this move along with adding other events like SMART just increasing the value of the subscription. Stafford fans that attended races may have passed on the $150 added cost may now sign on getting the added value from the NWMT, SMART etc.
    Last year the M&M boys must have blown Nascar’s mind by shutting them out and adding the 300. That was good grudge material but look what happened. Not just one date but two in 2022 and part of a block buster World Series as well. Really be honest did anyone see that coming???
    Stafford in my view may have made a tactical error in getting their back up and shutting out the tour in 2022. Being honest their schedule has a lot of volume and the Sizzler and Tri Track is nice but they lost the wow factor to Thompson and by a lot.
    Stafford will always have the advantage over most other tracks with regard to streaming since their pie is only divided up between FloRacing and themselves for the vast majority of their events. M&M have to pay the rent, pay NASCAR while losing streaming rights for their event and pay a streaming service like Racing America for non Nascar events. Nascar tracks same deal. Track needs to pay Nascar and Nascar owns the streaming rights.
    The NWMT needs to be back at Stafford in 2023. I believe it will be when everything resets and whatever hard feelings there may be take a back seat to building the best schedules. In the long run having both Stafford and the NWMT on FloRacing may actually help in getting over the streaming hurdle that caused Stafford to back their bags in the first place.

  10. Hard to say Stafford lost their wow factor to a track that only races 6 times.

  11. FloRacing is just a small part of FloSports. NASCAR coming to the service will not be a threat to FloSports as a business.

  12. ROGER ALLGEIER says

    how much

  13. So what about the people that cannot stream video? There are lots of us.

  14. Pete,
    Why wouldn’t you be able to stream the video? I would imagine if you have the technological means to leave this comment you would be able to stream the video.

  15. I live in rural northeastern Wisconsin. Severely limited internet speeds for many people. I have had Direct TV since 1996. I love it. I work in the TV sports business as an engineer so I’m not a dummy.

  16. Pete,
    Ok, so you haven’t had access to the live product for the past few years. It’s my understanding events will be rebroadcast somewhere through a non-streaming outlet at a later event, as has been the case in recent years.

  17. Pete J. Pfankuch wrote, “So what about the people that cannot stream video? There are lots of us.” and “I live in rural northeastern Wisconsin.”

    That’s your problem. You choose to live in such areas. For decades, bills have been proposed to get broadband out in the rural areas, but certain elected officials vote down such proposals. Be careful who you vote for. Some entities want to keep tight control on the dissemination of information, and you are living it. Stunning that in this day and age, the information age, obstructing the development of communication systems is a top priority.

    Look into satellite based services. That might be able to stream. See if Elon has his system working yet.

    Along those lines, I’ve had 200 Mbps down and 5Mbps up for many years, with even higher speed plans available. My ISP just upped my service to 300 Mbps down and 10 Mbps up, no price hike. I’ve had 3-4 screens streaming at once.

  18. That is a shame we take internet access for granted here in the Northeast and forget it’s not universal.
    NBC has made a huge deal over their USA Network becoming the new home for sports with NASCAR a big part of it. The NASCAR site teases the fact NWMT races may be covered on a delayed basis on USA. I’d bet they will be and USA has to be included in your satellite package I would guess.
    In the longer term it’s not like nothing is being done for rural areas. The infrastructure bill passed last year has 65 billion earmarked for improving internet access in rural areas.

    https://www.cs.columbia.edu/2021/how-will-the-infrastructure-bill-improve-internet-access-for-americans/

    Hopefully your region in Wisconsin will eventually see an improvement in speeds.

  19. Heh heh heh like anyone would move from our home on a big beautiful lake with a sunset view. Neighbors are seasonal and weekends. People that are addicted to internet, phones, social media, etc. while cutting the chord from cable or satellite TV are crazy often times watching everything on a tiny screen. Silly. Why bother with HD TV? You do not see it or need it for a phone. Satellite internet companies that my friends have all used limit data and are expensive. My DSL is fast enough for decent surfing and emails. That is all the internet is good for. I prefer over the air HD which is better than the satellite TV and way better than streaming. I make my living in sport TV and see the differences. At the prices streaming folks will be charging cable and satellite will be a better value. There are places where cell phones don’t have signals and satellite TV is not possible from their or their neighbors wooded lots.

    Hopefully MAVTV or one of the network sports channels will carry the events.

  20. Hey Pete J Pfankuch, here’s your problem: “My DSL is fast enough for decent surfing and emails. That is all the internet is good for. I prefer over the air HD which is better than the satellite TV and way better than streaming.”

    Well, that begs the question… how much HD OTA do you have out in the woods? Clearly none since you want to know what people that can’t stream can do to watch.

    To that I say, welcome to the real world. You want to live out in the woods, go right ahead.

    Exciting news, as I’m writing this and watching out my backyard, a rather large bobcat just walked by. And I’m using my 300Mbps/10Mbps internet service to do this.

    heh, heh, heh, heh, streaming is the way of the future for sports. If you work in the industry as you wrote, “I make my living in sport TV and see the differences.” then you would know this. And OTA HD is pretty good, as is streamed HD. I know.

    Streaming is the only way to go for what you are asking. There’s your answer.

    I hope you enjoy your antique DSL, and the decent surfing and emails, which you say is all the internet is good for. Well, except you want to stream racing which your antique DSL is not capable of doing. I barely remember when I had DSL, and today it has max speeds of 6 Mbps, which is not capable of streaming. Given your remote location, you are probably far from the switch, so your top speeds are even lower. Good luck. Write to the broadcasters and demand that they cover this off-off-off-off-broadway racing and broadcast it OTA HD in your remote area with 6 potential viewers. Let us know how that works out.

    Suck on your sour grapes.

  21. Thanks for your reply. I’ve been a part of the internet since Al Gore invented it. Humor! Long before most folks were. I’m happy with what I have. It will be a waste of tax payer dollars in many areas. There is not the population to support it. Most of my seasonal neighbors use their phones as hot spots. Some avoid the internet and TV. Others have satellite TV and internet. If you are a weekend user it may be fine but not for us full time users. I used to work for the TV company that did OFF-ROAD Racing. CORR Most was tape delayed on ESPN and eventually some was live on NBC and the Speed Channel.

    The government does not make money, the tax payers provide it. The companies will line their pockets and not much will change as no one will want to pay the likely high prices they will charge. Add in streaming fees for each content provider and it is obviously not likely to survive. MAVTV is very good. It might be the best place for it. I do get USA Network. Direct TV is not cheap but after 26 continuous years I’m happy with them. My TV’s are internet capable but not connected. No reason. They are set for 1080P, 1080I and 720P. Most folks are watching 480i thinking it is HD because it fills their screen . . . . . . . .

  22. Heh heh heh to streaming being the future of sports on television. Only sports that don’t have much interest to the masses. Over the air tv has the best HD quality and then it is HD satellite tv signals. They compress video on the internet a whole lot more. If you cannot see the differences that is good. You don’t know what you are missing.

    We did fine before the internet. Short track racing is the best in person. The longer tracks and road races are best on TV. Edited events can be much better than live as a talented producer, director and editor can make them awesome if they have the raw materials and enough time. MAVTV events are largely recorded and edited.

    Tax payers going to pay for it all eventually. The rich politicians won’t tax themselves.

  23. Pete: So what about the people that cannot stream video? There are lots of us.

    Shawn: Why wouldn’t you be able to stream the video? I would imagine if you have the technological means to leave this comment you would be able to stream the video.

    Pete: I live in rural northeastern Wisconsin. Severely limited internet speeds for many people. I have had Direct TV since 1996. I love it. I work in the TV sports business as an engineer so I’m not a dummy.

    Pete: There is not the population to support it. Most of my seasonal neighbors use their phones as hot spots. Some avoid the internet and TV. Others have satellite TV and internet. If you are a weekend user it may be fine but not for us full time users.

    Pete: My TV’s are internet capable but not connected. No reason.

    There’s a real good reason your internet capable TVs are not connected to the internet: you don’t have capable internet speeds. duh.

    I’ve toured through your region, it’s very pretty. I have a good friend who is from your region. He frequented the area back when it was prosperous. He’s told me all about it. While your region is very pretty, it is now sad and deplorable. Many decades ago, when US automobiles were the rage, your region was the land of weekend houses, second houses and cottages for the well to do from the booming automotive industry, and the feeders. Since the US automotive industry has imploded, your region has declined into severe, sustained depression, or simply reverted back into flyover country, and is sparsely populated. It was shocking to see abandoned camps, resorts, towns and even firehouses. About the only industry up your way now are pasties, wild rice, and smoked whitefish.

    Keep checking to see when Elon has his satellite based internet access available. Pricing looked good for rather decent speeds. Starlink is stating 100-200 Mbps downlink speeds. Check it out: https://www.starlink.com

    heh, heh, heh, heh, heh, the old saying still applies: You get what you pay for.

    If you don’t want to pay for it, don’t complain about not having it.

  24. I’m not complaining. I’m pointing out that many people may not be able to stream video. To some people the cost does come into play. Cost is really is not a concern of mine.

    It is funny to read some people’s logic. People want to believe that satellite internet is great it is not. Been there and experienced it. Many of my friends have too. Direct TV has some issues because of weather. Satellite internet is more susceptible and has slow upload speeds usually. A hard line into the house is best. Even copper as long as it is not to long from the fiber.

    Why would I want to watch inferior video quality on my big screens? I could stream video on the TV’s but again the quality is not there. They compress the crap out of video on the internet. Satellite TV compresses it a fair amount. I can see the difference in all three of them.

    Some people can’t understand that many of us don’t need more than we have or care to have it. I remember dial up internet days very well.

    The recreational world and recreational housing is very busy. We have recreational rentals and people want out of the cities and always have. We are full all summer and the year round one is too. Since Covid there are many more people wanting out of the cities.

    The concern now about getting broadband everywhere is 10 years late. The reason it does not exist now is cost per mile and the lack of demand. Adding another satellite internet service will just further divide the money available for this as people that need satellite will try a different service.

    People switch back and forth between Dish and Direct TV. Looking to save money most likely. I am able to write it off for rentals and work. The bill still has to be paid so it is real money. Is seems those two companies are doing OK. A third one perhaps would not.

  25. Pete wrote, “So what about the people that cannot stream video? There are lots of us.”

    Pete wrote, “I’m not complaining.”

    Yes, you are complaining.

    I’m not going to list all the other times you contradicted yourself.

  26. Pete wrote, “Some people can’t understand that many of us don’t need more than we have or care to have it.”

    Yet Pete wrote, “So what about the people that cannot stream video? There are lots of us.”

    Well, Pete, it looks like you are complaining about not having something you want. If you subscribe to a satellite internet service, you could have what you want. Problem solved. Don’t want to pay for it? That’s your problem. There are solutions available to you, but you don’t want to or can’t afford them. Stop complaining, that’s your problem.

  27. Heh heh heh. Guess some of you can’t read or comprehend/understand. I guess more than one thought at a time is beyond some of you . . . . . . sorry! Nest time I’ll go slower. I can’t fix those problems.

    Glad you are willing to pay for the money (tax payers money) the government will waste on it. It will have few paying customers. Go ahead and try to figure it out.

    I have work to do.

  28. Pete wrote, “So what about the people that cannot stream video? There are lots of us.”

    And then you wrote, “Why would I want to watch inferior video quality on my big screens? I could stream video on the TV’s but again the quality is not there. They compress the crap out of video on the internet. Satellite TV compresses it a fair amount. I can see the difference in all three of them.”

    Earlier, you made it appear that you did not stream because high speed was not available to your region, and you would if it was available.

    So streaming is not good enough for you. Your choice, your problem.

    Okay.

    Well, looks like you have to move into an area with high quality OTA HD and hope that what you want to see is available over-the-air. Good luck with that, since most live sports are already only available as streamed, and not available OTA. So it looks like your high quality uncompressed HD standards will prevent you from ever seeing most live sports ever again.

    😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝

    Your choice, your problem.

  29. I’m discussing stuff with a person than picks and dwells on every small detail. People like that need a life. It is possible to stream certain things. If you don’t mind stuttering, freezing and low resolution. DUH! Why would I settle for that to stream live racing or sports? I tend to DVR everything and thus don’t watch many commercials. U tube videos are low resolution and I watch some to gain knowledge of how to do things. They play just fine most of the time on my desktop computer. I am happy with what I have and how it works but others may not understand the technology like at least one person on this site.

  30. Pete, the subject is you not streaming this racing because you do not want to pay for it. Everything else is blah, blah, blah, blah, blah…

  31. The point all along is streaming audience is limited by availability of high enough quality internet. Why would anyone pay for something that won’t work well if at all consistently? Duh!

  32. Streaming better quality video requires much higher broadband speed. In order to stream 1080p or 720p, you will need a bandwidth of at least 5 Mbps. But the best speed for seamless 4K streaming is set at least 25 Mbps. It sucks up the limited data packages satellite companies offer real quick. When they slow a customer down you are not going to stream HD.

  33. Then get the right broadband speed for what you want to watch. Too obvious? If you don’t want to pay for it, don’t complain about it.

    The SLOWEST speed plan available from my ISP is 100Mbps, most plans are 200Mbps and higher. I was watching the NWMT race last night with several other screens of Olympics last night. It was awesome. 🤩 Beautiful picture and no buffering.

    Suck on your sour grapes.

  34. LOL as you obviously don’t get it at all. Many places have crappy internet. Some have none! Same with cell phone service. Many people do not care. You don’t want to believe any of it.

    Olympics are on USA too. I don’t care about them. Ratings are in the toilet for them so many people are not watching. See the above information about speeds, etc. The speed available has nothing to do with how your equipment including the TV you got a great deal on from a chain store is set up. I suspect you are watching 480i and thinking it is awesome. 480i is much better than analog NTSC. You’ve never even seen uncompressed HD video I suspect. Ever seen true 4K? How? LOL . . . . . .

  35. Pete says, ” blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah So what about the people that cannot stream video? There are lots of us. blah blah blah blah blahblah blah blah blah blahblah blah blah blah blahblah blah blah blah blahblah blah blah blah blahblah blah blah blah blahblah blah blah blah blahblah blah blah blah blahblah blah blah blah blahblah blah blah blah blahblah blah blah blah blahblah blah blah blah blahblah blah blah blah blah…”

    Pete wrote, “The speed available has nothing to do with how your equipment including the TV you got a great deal on from a chain store is set up.”

    What does that even mean????

    Speed has everything to do with the ability to stream. Well, and if you can or want to pay for it. But since Pete has prehistoric DSL that is good for about 5 Mbps max, he ain’t gonna be streaming. If decent speed isn’t available in your area, stop complaining that everything sucks and isn’t worth watching, but do continue to suck on your sour grapes.

  36. This is an interesting conversation taking out the confrontation.
    So what’s your point? You live in Wisconsin in a place that has limited and/or expensive internet service. You don’t seem to have any interest in seeing any public money spend to improve your options mainly because you feel the money would not be spent wisely.
    You do have Direct TV. love it and simply want to see the NWMT on that service.
    So what’s the problem? There is an excellent chance it will be provided on a delayed basis via USA Network. Follow the NASCAR site with a link to the Whelen Modified Tour and you can keep on top of when they announce what is available.
    Seems like your only concern is getting coverage on Direct TV. Just be patient. NBC is in transition regarding their sports coverage.
    NASCAR, FloRacing and USA Network have one thing in common. They are all starved for content. Floracing is already linked to NASCAR and NASCAR linked to USA Network.
    Patience grasshopper. All will be revealed in time.
    In the mean time count on RaceDayCt to provide you with the latest in everything related to the NWMT.

  37. Thanks Doug. You are correct about many satellite channels lacking content. They rerun everything many times on many channels. Still finding lots of specific stuff can be difficult.

    I’m trying to point out that many people cannot get streamed programming and won’t for a long time. It is sad and funny that people think the government will fix anything. Pick something they have fixed . . . . . . they just piss away tax payers money. The people on this list that don’t understand my points should move out of their parents basements. Maybe work on their GED’s?

  38. There definitely is an argument to be made about the degree of involvement the government should have with regard to any need and it’s effectiveness should it try to play a roll. The notion that the government can’t fix anything nor play a roll in making peoples lives better or at least less miserable is simply ignorant.
    I know one thing however. No one will dissuade you from those simplistic right wing talk media tropes and talking points so if you’re happy with Direct TV then more power to you. I made my old Dish into a patio fire pit and it works great.

  39. Pete Pfankuch wrote, “So what about the people that cannot stream video? There are lots of us.”

    How’s it going? Did you resolve your streaming deficiency, or are you expecting someone else to do it for you?

  40. LOL obviously you and a couple others are unable to understand the point of this? Streaming is not possible in many parts of the country. DUH! Sorry to the rest of you that get it.

  41. Pete, I completely understand that streaming is not possible in many parts of the country. I’ve done several tours of the country and experienced no cell phone service for days. Flyover country is called such for good reason. Some folks don’t have sewage, running water or electricity. I’m well aware of your plight. But then again, you choose to live that way, and pleading for others to do something about your self-inflicted problems is so red. You are your own victim.

    I just revised my service to 400Mbps. Tests out at about 440 Mbps. It’s much faster than I can ever use, even when streaming 4K content. I was streaming 4K with 200 Mbps service. But then, the price is phenomenal. I’ve been paying the same super low price for years, maybe a decade or two, for the same low price while the speeds have been upped. And I get to see bear 🐻, bobcat, deer 🦌, turkey 🦃, and all sorts of other wildlife in my backyard. Moose have been seen nearby, but I have yet to seen them. Beautiful sunsets 🌅.

    Suck on your sour grapes.

  42. Then why did you post this, ““So what about the people that cannot stream video? There are lots of us.”

    If you knew that you can’t stream, why did you post that? What was your point? What are you expecting?

    Pay up or stop whining.

  43. Pete wrote, ” Satellite internet companies that my friends have all used limit data and are expensive. My DSL is fast enough for decent surfing and emails. That is all the internet is good for. I prefer over the air HD which is better than the satellite TV and way better than streaming.”

    The internet is also very good for streaming. 😝

    You don’t want to pay for it, then don’t.

    Suck on your sour grapes.

  44. The companies selling streaming are the real potential losers. The reasons they offer streaming are one of several. No satellite company wants to air their stuff and/or pay them for it perhaps? The potential market may be to small. The companies streaming may be able to collect more money by streaming their product however there are more costs to do that. Most of the successful networks are adding streaming to try to draw in more money in addition to what they are already getting from satellite and over the air revenue.

    I am happy with what I have. I attend some dirt track events and have even worked for the broadcasters of many. I would like to see more dirt racing but sometimes it is not possible. There are other things I would like to see more of but often times they are not available either because there is not enough other interested people and companies that want to sponsor them.

    All this is likely beyond the abilities of some readers here to understand. They can do little more that pay the rent on the lot for their homes. I would never trade my rural lake location for fast internet service. Silly idea. I could rent a place in town and view streaming there if I really wanted to or I could visit a friend or my mom to stream video.

    Like I said the companies doing the streaming are the ones that could come up short eventually. I hope they survive and prosper.

  45. Pete Pfankuch wrote, “So what about the people that cannot stream video? There are lots of us.”

    Clearly NOT HAPPY about NOT BEING ABLE TO STREAM.

    Pete Pfankuch wrote, “I am happy with what I have.”

    Keep going Pete, you are entertaining.

  46. Got it. The views of Lake Noquebay are spectacular and I would guess worth every compromise one might have to make in tech to enjoy that environment from a quality of life standpoint.
    Repeating the same thing doesn’t make it more valid or interesting.

    Say something new or you’re just another one of we old farts babbling on trying to fill out days.
    Actually now I think of it you fit right in……….welcome!!!

Leave a Reply

Copyright 2018 E-Media Sports

Website Designed by Thirty Marketing